Home › Compare › Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: API Pricing Compared

Comparing Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: on combined input+output list price, Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper at $0.228 vs $0.3859 per 1M tokens — a difference of $0.1579 (41%). Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.027 in / $0.201 out with a 60,000-token context; Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0509 in / $0.335 out with a 131,072-token context.
Meta: Llama 3.2 1B InstructMeta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input /1M$0.027$0.0509
Output /1M$0.201$0.335
Cached input /1M——
Context window60,000131,072
Max output tokens54,00072,000
Cost @ 10M in + 2M out / mo$0.672$1.179

Estimate your own workload in the cost calculator, or open the full pages for Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper on combined list price: $0.228 vs $0.3859 per 1M tokens (input + output). At 10M input + 2M output tokens per month, Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.672 and Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $1.179.

Which has the larger context window, Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has a context window of 60,000 tokens; Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has 131,072 tokens. The larger one is Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Price snapshot October 21, 2026, refreshed daily.