Home › Compare › inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: API Pricing Compared
Comparing inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash and inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: on combined input+output list price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper at $0.084 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens — a difference of $0.216 (72%). inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021 in / $0.063 out with a 262,144-token context; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0.075 in / $0.225 out with a 262,144-token context.
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.021 | $0.075 |
| Output /1M | $0.063 | $0.225 |
| Cached input /1M | $0.0042 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Max output tokens | 32,768 | 235,929 |
| Cost @ 10M in + 2M out / mo | $0.336 | $1.2 |
Estimate your own workload in the cost calculator, or open the full pages for inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash and inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper on combined list price: $0.084 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens (input + output). At 10M input + 2M output tokens per month, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.336 and inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash costs $1.2.
Which has the larger context window, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash has a context window of 262,144 tokens; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has 262,144 tokens. The larger one is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash.
Price snapshot October 21, 2026, refreshed daily.